点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
海外华媒人感知中共二十大：面向世界 分享中国******
(中共二十大·声音)海外华媒人感知中共二十大：面向世界 分享中国
中新社北京10月19日电 题：海外华媒人感知中共二十大：面向世界 分享中国
作者 徐文欣 金旭
中共二十大正在召开，海外华文媒体人表示深受鼓舞，同时也希望通过他们的报道向世界传递中国声音。
10月16日，中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会在北京人民大会堂隆重开幕。 中新社记者 蒋启明 摄解析中国发展新动态、新格局
葡萄牙《葡新报》社长马丽梅在现场聆听了报告，她说：“中共二十大报告强调‘不断巩固全国各族人民大团结，加强海内外中华儿女大团结’让我印象深刻，海内外中华儿女一定会紧密团结，为推进中国式现代化贡献力量。”
马丽梅介绍，《葡新报》首次用住在国语言全方位报道大会。“大会解答了中外网友关心的问题，我们也及时向世界传递中国声音。”
会场上，欧洲新传媒集团总编辑范轩关注中国经济发展、民生福祉、涉侨事务、国际传播等议题。他称，第一手的新闻信息讯息主要靠新媒体平台实现快速传播，会用评论、人物故事等深度解析中国发展的新动态、新格局。
“面对复杂的国际环境，中共二十大报告直面客观现实，直击问题要害，以翔实的数字、严谨的思考提出解决问题的方法，让人们看到百年大党永葆本色的‘精神密码’。”《澳华财经在线》总编辑牛建明表示。
“报告亮点颇多，我从中读出了中国潜力、中国信心和中国智慧。”印度尼西亚《国际日报》执行社长张春梅深信，随着“一带一路”倡议逐步深化，中国倡导的构建人类命运共同体理念一定能成为国际社会的共识。
增强中华文化传播力、影响力
“中共二十大报告既是对过去中国发展的褒奖与肯定，又为下一段探索星辰大海的征程吹响号角。”印度尼西亚《国际日报》新媒体社长章维佳表示，将继续发挥桥梁纽带作用，推动中国与印尼友好合作。
华人头条董事长黄其旺参与了首场二十大“党代表通道”采访活动，并向故宫博物院院长王旭东进行提问。他说：“听到王旭东代表讲述如何加强国际间文化交流互鉴，我期待能以文物为纽带，深化中国与拉美国家之间的人文交流，向世界生动讲述中华民族悠久的历史和璀璨的文化。”
二十大报告强调“推进文化自信自强，铸就社会主义文化新辉煌”。尼日利亚《西非华声报》总编辑陈览月对此表示，“华媒人应努力增强中华文化传播力、影响力，用多种形式、多种载体展现可信、可爱、可敬的中国形象。”
把中国脱贫攻坚故事讲好、讲生动
埃及《中国周报》副社长朱新娥表示，报告声声有力，振奋人心。中国共产党在建党百年之际，打赢了人类历史上规模最大、力度最强的脱贫攻坚战，在消除贫困上取得历史性成就，为全球减贫作出巨大贡献。
“中国完成脱贫攻坚、全面建成小康社会的历史任务，创造了人类减贫史上的奇迹。华媒人有责任把中国脱贫攻坚的故事讲好、讲透、讲生动，让世界更了解真实的中国。”日中通信社社长胡文娟说。
“治国有常，利民为本。我们华文媒体定将竭尽所能，为实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦而努力。”荷兰《联合时报》社长陈光平说。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)